Skip to main content

Canvas by Magicstudio vs Cliclic - Which AI Product Image Generation Software Platform Is Better in February 2026?

Canvas by Magicstudio

Canvas by Magicstudio

Product photography for businesses.

Cliclic

Cliclic

AI Product Photos Background Editor

TL;DR - Quick Comparison Summary

Description

Canvas by Magicstudio is a revolutionary AI-powered tool designed for businesses to create professional product photos effortlessly. It eliminates the need for expensive photo shoots by

Introducing Cliclic - the ultimate AI product photo background editor. Say goodbye to dull, stagnant product images and hello to dynamic, visually stunning photos that instantly catch the

Pricing Options

  • Free Trial available
  • $24.99, month
  • Free Trial available
  • $5, month
Actions

What Do Canvas by Magicstudio and Cliclic Cost?

Pricing Option

      Starting From

      • $24.99, month
      • $5, month

      Canvas by Magicstudio User Reviews & Rating Comparison

      User Ratings

      No Reviews

      5/5

      Pros of Canvas by Magicstudio

      • Professional-grade product photos

      • Quick and easy use

      • Drag and drop feature

      • Supports jpeg and png

      • Instant background removal

      • Size and position adjustment

      • Pre-designed themes

      • Photo editing feature

      • Add elements to scene

      • Applicable for various uses

      Pros of Cliclic

      • Background changing feature

      • Promotes symbolic product travel

      • Encourages engaging content creation

      • Offers scene provision

      • Swift branded product images

      • Visually appealing backgrounds

      • Inclusion of matching scene elements

      • Produces personalized image outcomes

      • Supports custom canvas sizes

      • Adaptable to various marketing channels

      Cons of Canvas by Magicstudio

      • Limited to jpeg

      • png

      • Lacks advanced editing features

      • No batch processing feature

      • Doesn't support RAW formats

      • No multi-language support

      • Limited pre-designed themes

      • Subscription-based after free trial

      • No collaborative features

      • No version history management

      Cons of Cliclic

      • Limited theme personalization

      • No multi-language support

      • No collaboration feature

      • Lacks editing tool diversity

      • No 3D product view

      • Not Beginner-friendly interface

      • Fixed canvas proportion

      • Lack of free version

      • No upload size specification

      • Limited number of scenes

      Add to Compare

      Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

      Stuck on something? We're here to help with all the questions and answers in one place.

      Yes, both Canvas by Magicstudio and Cliclic offer a Free Trial.

      Pricing for Canvas by Magicstudio Starts at $24.99/month whereas for Cliclic Starts at $5/month.

      Canvas by Magicstudio offers several advantages, including Professional-grade product photos, Quick and easy use, Drag and drop feature, Supports jpeg and png, Instant background removal and many more functionalities.

      The cons of Canvas by Magicstudio may include a Limited to jpeg, png, Lacks advanced editing features, No batch processing feature. and No mobile application

      Cliclic offers several advantages, including Background changing feature, Promotes symbolic product travel, Encourages engaging content creation, Offers scene provision, Swift branded product images and many more functionalities.

      The cons of Cliclic may include a Limited theme personalization, No multi-language support, No collaboration feature, Lacks editing tool diversity. and Limited number of scenes

      Top-rated software of 2026

      Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox.

      By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of User and Privacy Policy

      Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].