Sourcegraph Cody vs Imaginary Programming - Which AI Code Assistant Software Platform Is Better in January 2026?

	Sourcegraph Cody Code assistant aiding coding queries & suggestions. Visit Website Visit Website	Imaginary Programming Code generation using TypeScript and GPT runtime. Visit Website Visit Website

TL;DR - Quick Comparison Summary

Description	Meet Sourcegraph Cody, the ultimate code assistant for developers. This AI-powered tool leverages Sourcegraph's code graph and Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide seamless coding Read more +	Introducing Imaginary Programming – a powerful SaaS tool that uses TypeScript and GPT runtime to automatically generate code. This innovative product leverages OpenAI's GPT engine to Read more +
Pricing Options	No free trial Not Available	No free trial Not Available
	Visit Website	Visit Website

What Do Sourcegraph Cody and Imaginary Programming Cost?

Pricing Option
Starting From	Not Available	Not Available
	View Detailed Pricing	View Detailed Pricing

Sourcegraph Cody User Reviews & Rating Comparison

	Pros of Sourcegraph Cody Chatbot knows your code Interactive code writing and refactoring Generates unit tests and documentation Assistive code suggestions App for code local on device VS Code and JetBrains extensions Integrated with Sourcegraph enterprise instance Chat interface in editor or sidebar Feedback for response improvement Generates code answering queries	Pros of Imaginary Programming TypeScript-based No need for ML team Generates structured data JSON data output Inclusion of Playground feature Frontend developers can add intelligence Solves new problems Can define function prototype Can classify data with human-like intelligence Extracts structured data from unstructured language
	Cons of Sourcegraph Cody Requires feedback for accuracy Limited editor extensions JetBrains extension is experimental Limited to Sourcegraph enterprise Requires full codebase access Dependency on open-source data Limited to pre-defined recipes Depends on existing coding conventions Context dependent fixup instructions Relies on Sourcegraph's code graph	Cons of Imaginary Programming TypeScript only Dependent on GPT availability No offline usage No predefined templates Reliant on good comments Lacks support for non-text tasks Limited to specific JS frameworks Not for backend development Requires manual output structure definition No mention of scalability

Media and Screenshots

Screenshots

Popular categories

Quick compares

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Stuck on something? We're here to help with all the questions and answers in one place.

Neither Sourcegraph Cody nor Imaginary Programming offers a free trial.

Pricing details for both Sourcegraph Cody and Imaginary Programming are unavailable at this time. Contact the respective providers for more information.

Sourcegraph Cody offers several advantages, including Chatbot knows your code, Interactive code writing and refactoring, Generates unit tests and documentation, Assistive code suggestions, App for code local on device and many more functionalities.

The cons of Sourcegraph Cody may include a Requires feedback for accuracy, Limited editor extensions, JetBrains extension is experimental, Limited to Sourcegraph enterprise. and Relies on Sourcegraph's code graph

Imaginary Programming offers several advantages, including TypeScript-based, No need for ML team, Generates structured data, JSON data output, Inclusion of Playground feature and many more functionalities.

The cons of Imaginary Programming may include a TypeScript only, Dependent on GPT availability, No offline usage, No predefined templates. and No mention of scalability

Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].

Sourcegraph Cody vs Imaginary Programming - Which AI Code Assistant Software Platform Is Better in January 2026?